The adjustment worried this new removal of next issues: step 1, 2, cuatro, six, thirteen, 15, 18, 20, twenty-two, 23, twenty-five and you will twenty-seven. Thus, immediately following reducing these items, Design dos(b) reached optimum values having goodness- of- match indices. The fresh new FJS made 15 things, where the worldwide Squared Multiple Correlations (SMC) index was .sixty, indicating you to sixty% of your variance was told me because of the latent points. New relationship between Basis 1 and you can Grounds dos is .66, it was .80 ranging from Grounds dos and Factor 3, and you may is actually .75 anywhere between Basis step 1 and you may Grounds 3, indicating the partnership between your three circumstances (Figure step 1). Standard Vi beautiful women weights varied from .64 (items 24) so you can .84 (items twenty two).
For Basis 1, Ordinal’s alpha are .94 and you can McDonald’s Omega is .93. Factor 2 reached an enthusiastic Ordinal alpha property value .95 and you can McDonald’s Omega is .ninety five. And you can Basis 3 had a credibility property value .ninety to own Ordinal’s leader and you can .88 for McDonald’s Omega.
Very first, Pearson correlations was achieved between the FJS dimensions and you may socio-demographic details. Gender is of FJS- Grounds 2 (Lover vigilance), in which women stated large scores (M= , SD = 6.15) than just men (Meters = nine.94, SD = 5.94). But not, to handle this problem carefully, a keen invariance study is actually held, causing conformity with metric invariance with similar CFI beliefs (.92) for both the non-contrast design plus the weighted design step one. As well, the essential difference between design step 1 weights and you can model dos intercepts and limits and you will design step three structural covariance differed by the viewpoints lower than 0.05 (model 1 = .92; model dos = .ninety and you can model step 3 = .90). Eventually, more regular Facebook explore are related to an increased amount of Fb jealousy (Dining table 5).
The results revealed that its twenty seven circumstances shaped a beneficial three-basis structure (Mate Passion, Partner Vigilance, and you may Partner’s Romantic and you will Sexual relationships) which the fresh leader would not raise or no item is actually eliminated
Secondly, new contacts between FJS proportions together with size of RPCS, self-admiration, and you can intimate envy was checked-out. The outcome gotten revealed that each other RPCS-Union and RPCS-Cures had been negatively for the three FJS factors. Ultimately, self-respect and you can personal jealousy coordinated seriously towards three FJS circumstances (Table 5). In addition, good linear regression studies was presented to raised look at new predictive property value the three FJS facts into the RPCS overall get, self-value, and you can close jealousy. Because found in Desk 6, new RPCS complete score is actually most readily useful predicted by Factor dos, i.e., lover vigilance, and you may worry about-respect is actually greatest forecast because of the Basis step 3, lover’s personal and you may sexual matchmaking, when you find yourself intimate jealousy is forecast by the the about three FJS facts.
Twitter is considered the most popular social media in the Colombia (Statcounter, 2020), and also as there are no surveys available to measure the jealousy regarding Facebook, the main goal of this study was to adjust and you will validate the FJS that have a sample off Colombian visitors. The conclusions shown your small type of the FJS into the a good Colombian take to is actually reliable and valid.
Decades coordinated adversely with around three FJS products, someone doing work in stretched dating reported down FJS-Grounds step 1 ratings (companion craft), when you find yourself zero extreme correlations was basically found ranging from relationships stage and you can FJS Points dos and step 3
About your foundation construction, to your one-hand, the dwelling of your size was checked out during the an EFA. But not, such show don’t coincide with earlier in the day knowledge, where the framework is unifactorial (Demirtas-Madran, 2016; Muise ainsi que al., 2009). Yet not, on Pakistani version of one’s FJS, the newest basis construction consisted of around three factors, titled from the article authors as follows: Low self-esteem, Inquisitiveness, and you can Unfaithfulness (Iqbal & Jami, 2017). Furthermore, in the shape of this new CFA, the main one-factor design advised regarding completely new type (Muise mais aussi al., 2009), which was ratified regarding the Turkish version (Demirtas-Madran, 2016) try examined. Although not, goodness-of-complement testing did not reveal an adequate complement. Ergo, the fresh multifactorial model extracted from the brand new EFA try looked at, but the model was not located getting sufficient goodness away from fit indicator.