After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. Out of lie recognition tools analyzed at the line to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being applied to asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to find the way these devices and to go after their right for security.
It also illustrates how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from being able to access the programs of safeguards. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of the technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who are disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double result: although they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental stars, and www.ascella-llc.com/ ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.