The attempt inhabitants had the average level of training into HPV out of 13.six +/? dos.0 (95% CI 13.2–13.9) into the a size away from 20. There had been significant variations in knowledge according to number of degree (U = 425.5; p = 0.004). Records knowledge towards the HPV try high into category with a high school-college education than the basic-no training. No differences in training had been discovered on account of many years (You = 1442.0; p = 0.150) or marital reputation (You = 1450.0; p = 0.122).
This new frequency away from disease predicated on HPV filter systems try shown inside the Shape 2A. Of your overall try population, 65.0% was in fact defined as HPV self-confident with forty two.1% of one’s inhabitants known become contaminated with a high-chance HPV. On the band of people with HPV, 75.6% off bacterial infections corresponded to a premier-chance genotype and you may 74.3% of your own people was indeed recognized to possess coinfections that have multiple HPV stresses (forty-eight.3% out of complete shot people). Particular coinfected women demonstrated up to 8 additional genotypes.
The remainder variables provided: age from which the fresh new fellow member turned into sexually effective (X 2 = step three,234; p = 0
Figure 2. (A) Regularity studies out of HPV illness in women predicated on standard of exposure, Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120 lr (reduced risk)-HPV 6, eleven, 42, 43, 44, 81 (CP8304). ir (undetermined chance)-HPV 26, 34, 40, 54, 55, 57, 61, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 82, 83, 84. time (risky)-HPV 16, 18, 30, 33, thirty five, 39, forty-five, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68. (B) Volume research from HPV disease in women considering decades; Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120. (C) Frequency study off hours HPV genotypes in women; Cuenca, Ecuador; 2019. n=120.
Whilst categories of female aged 56–65 and you will 31–forty five years of age got a higher ratio from HPV infections (Contour 2B), the brand new Z shot review having ratio are incapable of introduce extreme differences when considering age range (p > 0.050). There clearly was no association between age groups and you may HPV issues (X 2 = 2.746; p = 0.432).
The new volume shipments of your own hrHPV challenges try found into the Contour 2C. The most typical genotype was hrHPV 18, followed closely by genotypes 52, 66, 35, and you may 51 (X dos = eight.234; p = 0.041). HPV 16 got the lowest frequency from illness on the class studied.
step three.dos. Modeling regarding HPV illness
Dining table dos. HPV disease considering Parity, Smoking consumption, Number of sexual partners, Birth prevention and Immunosuppression periods in women from Cuenca Ecuador, 2019.
When you find yourself complete no connection are discovered ranging from HPV infection and you can condom have fun with, whenever accounting having relationship reputation, participants who were single or even in common-law unions, condom explore try associated with lower infectivity (Fisher’s X 2 = 5.852; p = 0.026; V Cramer = ? 0.293; p = 0.016). Having married female, that it organization was not discover (X dos = step 1.231; p = 0.412).
357), understanding of HPV (X dos = 0.261; p = 0.610), gynecological medical care (X 2 = 0.141; p = 0.708), host to home (X dos = 0.369; p = 0.562), education level (X dos = 0.188; p = 0.664), alcoholic beverages (X dos = 0.669; p = 0.413), age range (X 2 = dos.033; p = 0.362), past STIs (X dos = 1.553; p = 0.276), frequency out of sexual intercourse (X 2 = 0.701; p = 0.441), and you can marital standing (X 2 = step 1.528; p = 0.250). These people were maybe not of the HPV issues on attempt studied.
Digital logistic regression confirmed a connection ranging from parity, immunosuppression attacks, usage of oral contraceptives/IUDs, and positive HPV issues. The rest of the parameters was indeed omitted with the reasonable mathematical importance (p > 0.050) otherwise lower predictive energy which have a non-high Or. No confounding or interaction parameters had been located. The characteristics of design naimisiin Honduran-naisten kanssa gotten from the digital logistic regression was found inside Desk step 3.