Getting evaluating the amount of despair, i utilized the BDI-II scale , spanning 21 questions, which have a minimum score of 0 and you may a total of 63, and you may a cut fully out-of rating out of ? 17 . Customers exactly who did not go back brand new survey on time was delivered a reminder via mobile phone.
You can find around three versions of BDI-the initial BDI, composed from inside the 1961 in addition to revised sizes penned because the BDI-1A and BDI-II in 1978 and you may 1996, respectively . New BDI try commonly used since the a review tool of the health care benefits and you may scientists in several setup. In its latest adaptation, the new BDI-II is perfect Roumain femmes datant for some body aged ? 13 age and you can comprises situations about emotional the signs of depression like hopelessness, discomfort, and you will shame; intellectual symptoms; thinking to be penalized; and real attacks such as for instance exhaustion, diet, and you may decreased interest in sexual interest. When the decide to try was obtained, a value out of 0 to three belongs to for every respond to and full get are compared to an option to determine anxiety seriousness. The quality reduce-from ratings are as follows: 0–9: minimal depression, 10–18: lightweight despair, 19–29: reasonable depression, 30–63: serious anxiety. Higher overall ratings suggest really serious depressive attacks.
Statistical research are did utilizing the SPSS v.20 application (SPSS Inc., Chi town, IL, USA) while the Roentgen software packages (v.3) to possess analytical computing. Carried on research which have Gaussian delivery was shown due to the fact mean (± basic deviation [SD]) viewpoints, while proceeded parameters instead Gaussian delivery try shown as the median (interquartile variety) viewpoints. Moderate study are demonstrated since the pure frequencies (percentages). The condition of normality out-of proceeded changeable shipments is checked having fun with the fresh Kolmogorov–Smirnov decide to try, because the equality off variances is examined using Levene’s sample.
The significance of the differences between the groups of women with FSD and without FSD was assessed using Student’s t-test for Gaussian populations, while the Mann–Whitney U test was used for non-Gaussian populations. To assess the statistical significance between percentages, Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used. The impact of one or more confounding factors on the presence of FSD was assessed with both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models, while the goodness-of-fit was calculated using Nagelkerke’s R 2 method. We assessed the linearity of the continuous variables with respect to the logit of the dependent variable by applying the Box–Tidwell procedure. A p-value
Our analysis sample incorporated 104 feminine which have one another T1DM and you may Cat, and you may an indicate period of ± 6.86 age. The typical time of DM try ± nine.42 years and of thyroid gland condition is ± eight.52 many years. The fresh new handle category provided 101 women with just T1DM, with the exact same years and you may DM period because data test, we.elizabeth., ± 5.69 ages and you will ± ages, correspondingly. The general qualities of each other teams are demonstrated for the Dining table step 1.
The glycemic balance expressed by the average glycemic level and HbA1c was ± mg% and 9.9 ± 3.39%, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups. Microvascular complications were present in % of the patients, and macrovascular complications, in %. Diabetic polyneuropathy was present in % of the patients and retinopathy, in %. Further, % of the patients had chronic ischemic cardiac disease, while 4.30% had hypertension. In the control group, 6.9% of the patients had diabetic polyneuropathy, and 7.9% had retinopathy. Most of the patients were treated with intensified insulin therapy with four daily injections, while 15.4% used an insulin pump (Table 1). We determined thyroid function according to average TSH and FT4 levels, which were ± Miu/mL and 9.62 ± 6.09 pmol/L, respectively. We recorded the anti-TPO antibody and anti-Tg antibody levels as well as the type of treatment received by each patient (Table 1).